[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471807 ]
Leon Torres commented on OFBIZ-309: ----------------------------------- This is still an issue, it was never fixed. Do we understand what the issue is? It's very simple, if you use <implements> to include the attributes of another service definition, the included attributes will not retain whether the attribute is optional or not. > If a service is implemented as an interface, its settings for optional > attributes are ignored! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: OFBIZ-309 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-309 > Project: OFBiz (The Open for Business Project) > Issue Type: Bug > Components: framework > Affects Versions: SVN trunk > Reporter: Leon Torres > Priority: Critical > > This is bad: > If a service has some attributes with optional="false" and is implemented > with <implements service="">, the settings for optional are ignored and > default to "true" instead. > As an example, look up the service definition for upsRateEstimate in > webtools and compare to the service that it implements, > calcShipmentEstimateInterface. The interface defines a few optional fields > as false, which show up correctly for calcShipmentEstimateInterface but are > all set to true in upsRateEstimate. > It used to work, something must have broken it. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.