Not sure I am following you david. if you startofbiz in the root like it is now then you are using ofbiz in developement mode. if you start ofbiz in the runtime you are using it strictly in binary mode. so you have both. the startofbiz we use now, would be developement. I see the runtime as the deployment to other servers or the release image for binaries.
am I missing something? David E. Jones sent the following on 4/5/2007 8:58 AM: > > So, in other words: destroy being able to change anything on the fly, > have duplicates of nearly everything in OFBiz, etc? > > That would be very different from the run-in-place semantics, and we > would lose a lot of what is nice about OFBiz during development. > > -David > > > On Apr 5, 2007, at 5:45 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > >> how about >> Leave the build in the components, like they are now for development. >> >> copying all files needed to the runtime folder like that startofbiz.* >> hotdeploy folder,etc, so the runtime can be the only folder distributed. >> it would require a copy section be added to each build.xml >> >> >> Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 4/4/2007 12:52 AM: >>> Now that we have the new "runtime folder", containing all the runtime >>> objects, what about moving all the build/* files from each component >>> into a new runtime/build/ folder? >>> >>> In this way the only folder in which there will be files written while >>> building/running the system will be in the runtime folder. >>> >>> I see advantages in this approach, especially for the distribution of >>> pre-built releases: the pre-built release could be simply the source >>> official release + the pre-built objects in the runtime folder. >>> Also everything apart from the runtime folder could be in a read-only >>> file system (for example a cd). >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
