1) where applicable, create more screenlets that can be used to compose complex screens (in this example a "displayProductFeature", that accepts as input a productId and feature type, screen would be nice) 2) add more comments and information to the screens and screenlets (and to the bsh and ftl scripts chunks) to explain 3) in general, review the existing code and try to modernize it (some code is old and could benefit of some new framework features), possibly migrating some parts to the widgets (screen actions/Minilang)
Hans, in my opinion, your patch is not bad in general (and I understand what your goal is) but as is now it will not make the page more reusable/customizable because I cannot imagine a real web site that will want to show all the features in a list: most customers will need to group features in different areas (tabs) of the product detail screen.
And about adding the new field/flag: this can be done, but I don't think that we should add this just to render this list in the product detail screen, I'd like to get some real requirements about this.
Jacopo Jonathon -- Improov wrote:
I think the original idea of showing only the SIZE feature is already a hack, a hardcoding. Still, it could be work-in-progress, easy to roll out quickly. Also, showing only the SIZE feature is safe, easy to fit into a product summary.> Ok, to make people happy in both situations, let's add a flag to the feature> entity where can be indicated that the feature should not show up in > e-commerce.I think this should be part of the change set, to complete the new feature "Automatically show all features applied to a product". Without it, the change set opens up a new problem, that of showing way too many features in the product summary, as David mentioned.In any case, it would be nice to be able to flag which features show up where. Could we add a field "showInEcomProdSummary" to the feature entity?I can't imagine sticking only with the SIZE feature. I can understand why Hans would desire to break out of that limitation.Jonathon David E Jones wrote:Could someone else take a pass at explaining this? I'm not sure how to phrase it any different than I have or offer any more supporting artifacts than I have.-David Hans Bakker wrote:I am sorry David, i do not see both of your points, why it does not belong in the main project and why it does not fit with the data structure? My intention is simply that i see a benefit here saving time for future implementations. My i ask you why you not reply on my arguments? regards, Hans On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:59 -0600, David E Jones wrote:Yeah, the point is that this doesn't belong in the main project, it doesn't fit with the intent of that data structure.Are you not using a custom template for this for your client? When you have something that is good for your client but not for the project, that's what should be done, it shouldn't go back into the project.-David Hans Bakker wrote:David,The only areas i see, where the allocated features should not show up isin the usage of features in manufacturing and searching. Most of my customers do not use the features there. What they want however is that we are not involved when they add a feature to a product and want to use that in e-commerce. Is modification of this new code not much easier then to add the new code in the old situation? In the old situation you ALWAYS have to modify when people are using features, in the new situation sometimes. Ok, to make people happy in both situations, let's add a flag to the feature entity where can be indicated that the feature should not show up in e-commerce. regards, Hans On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 04:41 -0600, David E Jones wrote:Hans,So the intention is that it's useful to have all features show up? Could be more specific, what exactly are you trying to have show?Features are used for a lot of different things. Here is a list of the OOTB types, and many companies add additional types as needed. We do have a couple of clients (one in the metal mesh industry and one in the jewelry industry) with dozens of features on each Product in order to enable parametric searches, configuration and UI options, and lots of other stuff.Here is a list of types from the ProductTypeData.xml file:<ProductFeatureType description="Accessory" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="ACCESSORY"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Amount" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="AMOUNT"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Net Weight" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="AMOUNT" productFeatureTypeId="NET_WEIGHT"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Artist" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="ARTIST"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Billing Feature" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="BILLING_FEATURE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Brand" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="BRAND"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Care" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="CARE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Color" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="COLOR"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Dimension" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="DIMENSION"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Equipment Class" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="EQUIP_CLASS"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Fabric" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="FABRIC"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Genre" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="GENRE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Gift Wrap" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="GIFT_WRAP"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Hardware Feature" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="HARDWARE_FEATURE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Hazmat" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="HAZMAT"/> <ProductFeatureType description="License" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="LICENSE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Origin" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="ORIGIN"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Other Feature" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="OTHER_FEATURE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Product Quality" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="PRODUCT_QUALITY"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Size" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="SIZE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Software Feature" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="SOFTWARE_FEATURE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Style" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="STYLE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Symptom" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="SYMPTOM"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Topic" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="TOPIC"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Type" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="TYPE"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Warranty" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="WARRANTY"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Model Year" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="MODEL_YEAR"/> <ProductFeatureType description="Year Made" hasTable="N" parentTypeId="" productFeatureTypeId="YEAR_MADE"/>Do we REALLY want to automatically show these to the customer? -David Hans Bakker wrote:David,I think it is usefull that features show up automatically without manualintervention, and when not desired can easily be supressed.Can you explain to me in which cases you have hundreds of features you do not want to show a customer? I can not even imagine that. Also theDemo data does not have these cases. Regards, Hans On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 01:54 -0600, David E Jones wrote:Hans, What was the intent of this change? It seems a little funny to me because: 1. many features are not meant to EVER be shown a customer2. a product could have dozens or hundreds of features, which doesn't fit so well in a productsummary-David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Author: hansbak Date: Tue Sep 18 00:23:41 2007 New Revision: 576743 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=576743&view=rev Log:list all features of a product in the product summary and not only a specific one.Modified:ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/catalog/productsummary.bsh ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/entry/catalog/productsummary.ftlModified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/catalog/productsummary.bsh URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/catalog/productsummary.bsh?rev=576743&r1=576742&r2=576743&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/catalog/productsummary.bsh (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/WEB-INF/actions/entry/catalog/productsummary.bsh Tue Sep 18 00:23:41 2007@@ -137,12 +137,41 @@ } }-// an example of getting features of a certain type to show -sizeProductFeatureAndAppls = delegator.findByAnd("ProductFeatureAndAppl", UtilMisc.toMap("productId", productId, "productFeatureTypeId", "SIZE"), UtilMisc.toList("sequenceNum", "defaultSequenceNum"));+// Show all features and their values: +List productFeatures = new LinkedList();+productFeatureAndAppls = delegator.findByAnd("ProductFeatureAndAppl", + UtilMisc.toMap("productId", productId), + UtilMisc.toList("productFeatureTypeId","sequenceNum", "defaultSequenceNum"));+pfIter = productFeatureAndAppls.iterator(); +oldProductFeatureTypeId = null; +values = new LinkedList(); +while (pfIter.hasNext()) { + productFeatureAppl = pfIter.next();+ Debug.logInfo("processing product: " + productId + " " + productFeatureAppl.getString("productFeatureTypeId") + "--" + productFeatureAppl.getString("description"), ""); + if (oldProductFeatureTypeId != null && !oldProductFeatureTypeId.equals(productFeatureAppl.getString("productFeatureTypeId"))) {+ productFeatures.add(+ UtilMisc.toMap("description", + delegator.findByPrimaryKeyCache("ProductFeatureType", UtilMisc.toMap("productFeatureTypeId", oldProductFeatureTypeId)).getString("description"), + "abbreviation",oldProductFeatureTypeId, + "types", values));+ values = new LinkedList();+ } + values.add(productFeatureAppl.getString("description")); + oldProductFeatureTypeId = productFeatureAppl.getString("productFeatureTypeId");+} +if (values.size() != 0) { + productFeatures.add(+ UtilMisc.toMap("description", + delegator.findByPrimaryKeyCache("ProductFeatureType", UtilMisc.toMap("productFeatureTypeId", oldProductFeatureTypeId)).getString("description"), + "abbreviation",oldProductFeatureTypeId, + "types", values));+ context.put("productFeatures", productFeatures); +} else { + context.remove("productFeatures"); +}context.put("product", product);context.put("productStoreId", productStoreId); context.put("categoryId", categoryId); context.put("productReviews", reviews);-context.put("sizeProductFeatureAndAppls", sizeProductFeatureAndAppls); Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/entry/catalog/productsummary.ftl URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/entry/catalog/productsummary.ftl?rev=576743&r1=576742&r2=576743&view=diff ============================================================================== --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/entry/catalog/productsummary.ftl (original) +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/webapp/ordermgr/entry/catalog/productsummary.ftl Tue Sep 18 00:23:41 2007@@ -93,17 +93,15 @@ <div class="tabletext">${prodCatMem.comments}</div> </#if>- <#-- example of showing a certain type of feature with the product -->- <#if sizeProductFeatureAndAppls?has_content>+ <#-- list all feature types and values with the product -->+ <#if productFeatures?has_content> <div class="tabletext"> - <#if (sizeProductFeatureAndAppls?size == 1)> - Size: - <#else> - Sizes Available: - </#if>- <#list sizeProductFeatureAndAppls as sizeProductFeatureAndAppl> - ${sizeProductFeatureAndAppl.abbrev?default(sizeProductFeatureAndAppl.description?default(sizeProductFeatureAndAppl.productFeatureId))}<#if sizeProductFeatureAndAppl_has_next>,</#if>- </#list> + <#list productFeatures as productFeature>+ <b>${productFeature.description?default(productFeature.abbreviation)}(s):</b> + <#list productFeature.types as type> + ${type}<#if type_has_next>,</#if>+ </#list> + </#list> </div> </#if> <div class="tabletext">
