[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12545221
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1387:
----------------------------------------
David,
If we really want to use it in UI, for consistency, i18n seems better to have
than not. So it comes back to question "do we really want to use it in UI" ?
About XML : is there in place an l10n mechanism as for properties files (which
we know as implemented by Sun is a bit deficient) ?
> comment Entities
> ----------------
>
> Key: OFBIZ-1387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1387
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: accounting, content, ecommerce, framework, humanres,
> manufacturing, marketing, order, party, pos, product
> Reporter: BJ Freeman
> Assignee: Adrian Crum
> Attachments: party_entity_model.patch
>
>
> comment the Entities files in the entitymodel.xsd
> put a comment in this jira of the entities you are going to comment
> when you attact your patch number it with a date, so if you don't do the
> whole thing someone else can add to it, and not overwrite your patch.
> hope the committers don't mind this break in the rules.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
