As per the discussion on http://markmail.org/message/4mrffmp5j2mujv3w and OFBIZ-9902. <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9902> We have prepared markdown file with the data model changes from OFBiz R9 to 17. It will help users/developers to identify data model changes that come with the release.
I think this can be the part of our next release. Patch is available on the ticket, kindly have a look and let me know if any changes required. Thanks and Regards, *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-sharma-78291810a/> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > +1 > > Jacques > > > > Le 19/12/2017 à 11:53, Deepak Dixit a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> I would like to backport ecommerce UX improvement work and remaining >> jquery >> upgrade work. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> -- >> Deepak Dixit >> www.hotwaxsystems.com >> www.hotwax.co >> >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> >> wrote: >> >> sound good +1 >>> >>> >>> >>> Le 19/12/2017 à 11:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>> >>> My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case >>>> the >>>> backporting of any additional feature. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Le 18/12/2017 à 18:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux < >>>>> >>>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There are 3 tasks that I'd like to be completed/committed before we >>>>>> create >>>>>> >>>>>> the R17 branch (or maybe a R18 one) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Tomcat SSO: OFBIZ-10047 >>>>>>> 2. Upgrade jQuery 1.11.0 to jQuery 3.2.1: OFBIZ-9978 >>>>>>> 3. The thread "OFBiz & gradlew-wrapper.jar" in this ML: >>>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/nd7grfiyobjkfwae >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. For jQuery it's just a matter of completing, most it done >>>>>>> 2. Tomcat SSO is complete, but Michael is reluctant because it has >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> been tested with a cluster. >>>>>>> 3. For OFBiz & gradlew-wrapper.jar please refer to LEGAL-288 before >>>>>>> continuing the discussion >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So I ask for a lazy consensus about them, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you please better elaborate about what the lazy consensus would >>>>>>> >>>>>> achieve in these 3 cases? >>>>>> For #3, I think we can create the branch and then figure it out before >>>>>> issuing the first release oout of it (it will take weeks if not >>>>>> months). >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>> >>>>>> Mmm, I thought it was clear enough. Let me try to summarise then: >>>>>> >>>>> 1. Should we commit it to have it in R17? >>>>> 2. Should we wait for this task to be complete before freezing R17? >>>>> 3. Your proposition is OK with me >>>>> >>>>> Jacques >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> what are your opinions (please look at the Jiras and ML I don't want to >>>>> >>>>>> rehash all here)? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also "I have" ideas for 2018, based on ideas from 2014, but that's >>>>>>> another >>>>>>> topic :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 18/12/2017 à 16:19, Michael Brohl a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've just finished committing all those FindBugs and refactoring >>>>>>>> issues >>>>>>>> so no more show stoppers from my side to create the next release >>>>>>>> branch >>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 28.11.17 um 17:03 schrieb Michael Brohl: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am planning to do a bunch of FindBugs/refactoring commits in the >>>>>>>>> coming days/weeks, hopefully all of the currently open issues. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It would be great if we can move the release to December. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @all: any help on the FindBugs/refactoring issues by fellow >>>>>>>>> committers >>>>>>>>> are greatly appreciated ;-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 28.11.17 um 16:42 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's the end of November and we are close to the deadline for the >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> creation >>>>>>>>>> of the 17.11 branches: how do we feel about it? >>>>>>>>>> Let me know if you want me to proceed, otherwise we will create >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> branches in December and they will be named 17.12 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Nicolas Malin < >>>>>>>>>> nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Agree to create the release 17.11 with a separate products >>>>>>>>>> framework >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> & >>>>>>>>>>> plugins. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's woulb be nice to create this release one week after the next >>>>>>>>>>> community days :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Nicolas >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 10/10/2017 à 09:35, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think it is time to start thinking about if, when, how we >>>>>>>>>>> should >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>>>> the new release branch out of the trunk. Actually, for the first >>>>>>>>>>>> time, we >>>>>>>>>>>> should probably create two branches: one for the framework and >>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>> for the >>>>>>>>>>>> plugins. >>>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion we could try to get all the changes we want to >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> trunk to be included in the branch by end of November: this >>>>>>>>>>>> means >>>>>>>>>>>> that the >>>>>>>>>>>> the creation of the branch could happen at the end of November. >>>>>>>>>>>> If this is the case then the names could be: >>>>>>>>>>>> release17.11-framework >>>>>>>>>>>> release17.11-plugins >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The above is for the release *branches* only, not for the actual >>>>>>>>>>>> releases. >>>>>>>>>>>> We could decide at a later point if the actual releases will be >>>>>>>>>>>> shipped as >>>>>>>>>>>> two separate products (e.g. "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.11.01" >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> "Apache >>>>>>>>>>>> OFBiz Plugins 17.11.01") or merged into one (e.g. "Apache OFBiz >>>>>>>>>>>> 17.11.01"). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >
