Hi Jacques, I can help with the cluster implementation and test. Need to plan a time for it. Will be a new JIRA issue as you mentioned.
Regards, James Yong On 2017-12-20 16:16, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > That's a good idea James. > > Will you handle the cluster implementation and test? > > BTW it's the only point among those I raised which remains after the > suggestion of backporting features on case by case in R17 > > Jacques > > > Le 20/12/2017 à 06:32, James Yong a écrit : > > Hi All, > > > > Can we commit the code for Tomcat SSO (OFBIZ-10047) but switch the feature > > off? > > Once the Cluster SSO is ready, we can backport to the 17.xx branch with > > Tomcat SSO turned on. > > > > Regards, > > James > > > > > > On 2017-12-19 20:43, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >> Now that we seems to agree about discussing each case, what about mine? :) > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >> > >> Le 19/12/2017 à11:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrità: > >>> My preference is to create the branch now and discuss on a case by case > >>> the > >>> backporting of any additional feature. > >>> > >>> Jacopo > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > >>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Le 18/12/2017 à18:02, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > >>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> There are 3 tasks that I'd like to be completed/committed before we > >>>>> create > >>>>>> the R17 branch (or maybe a R18 one) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. Tomcat SSO: OFBIZ-10047 > >>>>>> 2. Upgrade jQuery 1.11.0 to jQuery 3.2.1: OFBIZ-9978 > >>>>>> 3. The thread "OFBiz & gradlew-wrapper.jar" in this ML: > >>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/nd7grfiyobjkfwae > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. For jQuery it's just a matter of completing, most it done > >>>>>> 2. Tomcat SSO is complete, but Michael is reluctant because it has not > >>>>>> been tested with a cluster. > >>>>>> 3. For OFBiz & gradlew-wrapper.jar please refer to LEGAL-288 before > >>>>>> continuing the discussion > >>>>>> > >>>>>> So I ask for a lazy consensus about them, > >>>>>> > >>>>> Could you please better elaborate about what the lazy consensus would > >>>>> achieve in these 3 cases? > >>>>> For #3, I think we can create the branch and then figure it out before > >>>>> issuing the first release oout of it (it will take weeks if not months). > >>>>> > >>>>> Jacopo > >>>>> > >>>> Mmm, I thought it was clear enough. Let me try to summarise then: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Should we commit it to have it in R17? > >>>> 2. Should we wait for this task to be complete before freezing R17? > >>>> 3. Your proposition is OK with me > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> what are your opinions (please look at the Jiras and ML I don't want to > >>>>>> rehash all here)? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Also "I have" ideas for 2018, based on ideas from 2014, but that's > >>>>>> another > >>>>>> topic :) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Le 18/12/2017 à16:19, Michael Brohl a écrit : > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Jacopo, all, > >>>>>>> I've just finished committing all those FindBugs and refactoring > >>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>> so no more show stoppers from my side to create the next release > >>>>>>> branch > >>>>>>> :-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Michael > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Am 28.11.17 um 17:03 schrieb Michael Brohl: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, > >>>>>>>> I am planning to do a bunch of FindBugs/refactoring commits in the > >>>>>>>> coming days/weeks, hopefully all of the currently open issues. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It would be great if we can move the release to December. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> @all: any help on the FindBugs/refactoring issues by fellow > >>>>>>>> committers > >>>>>>>> are greatly appreciated ;-) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks and regards, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Michael > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Am 28.11.17 um 16:42 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> It's the end of November and we are close to the deadline for the > >>>>>>>>> creation > >>>>>>>>> of the 17.11 branches: how do we feel about it? > >>>>>>>>> Let me know if you want me to proceed, otherwise we will create the > >>>>>>>>> branches in December and they will be named 17.12 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Jacopo > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:09 PM, Nicolas Malin < > >>>>>>>>> nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Agree to create the release 17.11 with a separate products > >>>>>>>>>> framework > >>>>>>>>>> & > >>>>>>>>>> plugins. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> It's woulb be nice to create this release one week after the next > >>>>>>>>>> community days :) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Nicolas > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Le 10/10/2017 à09:35, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think it is time to start thinking about if, when, how we should > >>>>>>>>>>> create > >>>>>>>>>>> the new release branch out of the trunk. Actually, for the first > >>>>>>>>>>> time, we > >>>>>>>>>>> should probably create two branches: one for the framework and one > >>>>>>>>>>> for the > >>>>>>>>>>> plugins. > >>>>>>>>>>> What do you think? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> In my opinion we could try to get all the changes we want to have > >>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>> trunk to be included in the branch by end of November: this means > >>>>>>>>>>> that the > >>>>>>>>>>> the creation of the branch could happen at the end of November. > >>>>>>>>>>> If this is the case then the names could be: > >>>>>>>>>>> release17.11-framework > >>>>>>>>>>> release17.11-plugins > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> The above is for the release *branches* only, not for the actual > >>>>>>>>>>> releases. > >>>>>>>>>>> We could decide at a later point if the actual releases will be > >>>>>>>>>>> shipped as > >>>>>>>>>>> two separate products (e.g. "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.11.01" and > >>>>>>>>>>> "Apache > >>>>>>>>>>> OFBiz Plugins 17.11.01") or merged into one (e.g. "Apache OFBiz > >>>>>>>>>>> 17.11.01"). > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jacopo > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > >
