On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Done, should we not remove R14 and R15 version? > > This is a good question. In fact I have spent some time thinking about it and I propose to archive all the Jira versions for "release branches" that are: * "Release Branch 16.11": we will use instead 16.11.04 for the "Affects Version" field and the 16.11.05 for the "Fix Version" field * "Release Branch 15.12": we can simply archive it as Jacques suggested * "Release Branch 14.12": we can simply archive it as Jacques suggested * "Release Branch 13.07": we can simply archive it as Jacques suggested * "Trunk": this is a special one; I propose to archive it and use "Upcoming Branch" instead of it but rename it from "Upcoming Branch" to "Trunk/Upcoming Branch" (or similar) In this way we will have two simpler and less confusing groups of Jira versions: A) released (to be used for the "Affects Version" field): - "16.11.04" B) unreleased (to be used for the "Fix Version" field): - "16.11.05" - "Trunk/Upcoming Branch" When we will create the new branch we will rename it to xx.yy.01 and we will create a new version with the "Trunk/Upcoming Branch" name (exactly as we are doing with the "Upcoming Branch" version). Jacopo
