Thanks for your feedback. Here is the ticket id OFBIZ-10391 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10391>.
Thanks *Aman Agrawal* Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Sharan Foga <sha...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 2018/05/03 06:40:43, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Aman, > > +1 for making it configurable. > > > > By PartyAcctgPreference.enableAccounting flag you mean for an OFBiz > > instance if flag is enable then for that company/organization accounting > > transactions recorded otherwise not. That also mean, for an instance we > may > > record the accounting transaction for one organization and do not record > > accounting transaction for other organization. > > > > This is something I couldn't imagine in real world business scenario. > > Hi Rishi > > Something I've come across quite a few times is this. > > Imagine the case where you have several companies recording transactions > then one stops trading temporarily or permanently, becomes insolvent or > merges with another one, which means that from a specific date you don’t > want it any new transactions recorded a against it. > > The existing transactions that have been processed are still valid in the > previous company party and you will probably want to report on them from a > historic perspective – but you would want to stop any new transactions > being posted to that previous company. > > Thanks > Sharan > > So > > big +1 for making it configurable but not sure about weather we should go > > for PartyAcctgPreference or may consider SystemProperty for that. > > > > Looking for others input, BTW, no objection on using PartyAcctgPreference > > but thinking if it is useful to add checks/efforts for organizations over > > same instance. > > > > > > > > Rishi Solanki > > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > www.hotwax.co > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Aman Agrawal < > > aman.agra...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > In current flow, if we want to disable the accounting then we need to > > > disable the set of seca's. We don't have any configurable setting to > > > disable accounting. > > > So, I have a proposal to make accounting transaction entries > configurable. > > > We can manage this by adding a new field 'enableAccounting' in the > > > 'PartyAcctgPreference' entity. Accounting transaction entries will be > > > entertained accordingly. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > *Aman Agrawal* > > > Sr. Enterprise Software Engineer > > > www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > www.hotwax.co > > > > > >
