+1 for backport Thanks and Regards,
*Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Commerce <http://www.hotwax.co/> by HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/> [image: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:53 AM Arun Patidar <arun.pati...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 for backport > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 2:53 PM Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 for backport. > > > > -- > > Rishi Solanki > > Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > > HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > > Direct: +91-9893287847 > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > www.hotwax.co > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:56 PM Pierre Smits <pierresm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Jacques, > > > > > > I support the suggestion made by Sharan. It should not be too > difficult, > > > when a release has been made available (this should be part of the > > release > > > activities), to generate the 'release' related documents and hook it > into > > > the website. Our (potential) adopters will benefit. > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > > > *Apache Trafodion <https://trafodion.apache.org>, Vice President* > > > *Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member* > > > Apache Incubator <https://incubator.apache.org>, committer > > > *Apache OFBiz <https://ofbiz.apache.org>, contributor (without > > privileges) > > > since 2008* > > > Apache Steve <https://steve.apache.org>, committer > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:59 PM Jacques Le Roux < > > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > > > > > At > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Draft+Documentation+Roadmap > > > > > > > > Sharan already suggested to "Backport to releases where possible" > > > > > > > > I think we should do that and not way R18 to use the AsciiDoc > > generation > > > > even if it's not complete > > > > > > > > Opinions before I get ahead? > > > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 14/11/2018 à 08:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > So start this discussion, currently our main documents in > > docs\asciidoc > > > > refer to the R17 release. But those document don't exist in R17 > branch. > > > > > > > > > > I think it's not too late to backport them, but do we want to do > so? > > > > > > > > > > Also I suggested to have an easy access to the documentation from > the > > > > site documentation page. > > > > > > > > > > Do we also want to use the AsciiDoc generated documentation as we > did > > > to > > > > provide an online help from the applications? > > > > > > > > > > Do we want to provide something like > > > > https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML? > > > > > > > > > > For me the answers to these questions is NO! We should have a sole > > > entry > > > > point for the documentation and it should be from the site > > documentation > > > > > page. It's then easy to provide links from there (using anchors > going > > > to > > > > automatically generated IDs sections) > > > > > > > > > > What are your opinions? (I know I should re-read this thread > > > > https://markmail.org/message/35ak34fpzlyjiopt and I started...) > > > > > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
