I think that the simplest way to convey this message is to edit the README document with a link to OpenJDK rather than Oracle JDK.
Jacopo On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:22 AM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > We should then make clear to our users that they will need to switch to > OpenJDK if they want free security support. > > I guess most are aware, but maybe not small companies or single users. > > Jacques > > Le 28/02/2019 à 18:48, Michael Brohl a écrit : > > +1 for Taher's suggestion. > > > > Thanks, Michael > > > > Am 28.02.19 um 12:32 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb: > >> Perhaps we can keep ofbiz 17.12 on java 8, and let 18.12 and trunk > >> switch to java 11 on openjdk. This might provide stability expected by > >> users as indicated by Michael. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:27 PM Jacques Le Roux > >> <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> During discussions in the "Oracle Java release model changes and > consequences for the project" thread, we created "Upgrade OFBiz to use Java > JDK > >>> Version 11" aka OFBIZ-10757. > >>> > >>> There we began to discuss not only if we should switch to Java 11 LTS > (Long Time Support), which is obviously the best current choice, but also > which > >>> Java JDK origin we should use OOTB. > >>> > >>> So we have few options and we should clarify what the community wants. > >>> > >>> Options are: > >>> > >>> 1. Do we agree to use https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html as > Java JDK origin OOTB? > >>> 2. Which branches should switch to Java1? Obviously the trunk and > R18 should. Should R17, which is not yet released, switch also? > >>> > >>> I hope we don't need a vote and will quickly find a consensus. > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > > >
