Maybe adding a link to
https://medium.com/@javachampions/java-is-still-free-2-0-0-6b9aa8d6d244 would
help also
Le 04/03/2019 à 12:31, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
+1
Jacques
Le 04/03/2019 à 11:34, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
I think that the simplest way to convey this message is to edit the README
document with a link to OpenJDK rather than Oracle JDK.
Jacopo
On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:22 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
We should then make clear to our users that they will need to switch to
OpenJDK if they want free security support.
I guess most are aware, but maybe not small companies or single users.
Jacques
Le 28/02/2019 à 18:48, Michael Brohl a écrit :
+1 for Taher's suggestion.
Thanks, Michael
Am 28.02.19 um 12:32 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:
Perhaps we can keep ofbiz 17.12 on java 8, and let 18.12 and trunk
switch to java 11 on openjdk. This might provide stability expected by
users as indicated by Michael.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 2:27 PM Jacques Le Roux
<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi,
During discussions in the "Oracle Java release model changes and
consequences for the project" thread, we created "Upgrade OFBiz to use Java
JDK
Version 11" aka OFBIZ-10757.
There we began to discuss not only if we should switch to Java 11 LTS
(Long Time Support), which is obviously the best current choice, but also
which
Java JDK origin we should use OOTB.
So we have few options and we should clarify what the community wants.
Options are:
1. Do we agree to use https://adoptopenjdk.net/releases.html as
Java JDK origin OOTB?
2. Which branches should switch to Java1? Obviously the trunk and
R18 should. Should R17, which is not yet released, switch also?
I hope we don't need a vote and will quickly find a consensus.
Thanks
Jacques
