Now that Nicolas has implemented the Bintray approach on 16.11, I propose to delete the binary and script files that are available in Bintray: in this way the release branch will be the same as our release files and we will have a more solid way to test that the init script works well. Any objections?
Jacopo On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:49 PM Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> wrote: > Nice review, It's ok for me > > Thanks Jacopo > > Nicolas > > On 8/21/19 10:07 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > Thank you! > > In rev. 1865605 I have updated the README files and improved some of the > > messages (and comments) in the script. > > Please have a look and let me know what you think. > > > > Jacopo > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:29 PM Nicolas Malin <nicolas.ma...@nereide.fr> > > wrote: > > > >> Ok it's down on bintray :) > >> > >> I also update shasum fingerprint at revision 1865546, and manage to > >> download gradlew when it's not present. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Nicolas > >> > >> On 8/19/19 12:58 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>> Le 18/08/2019 à 17:01, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > >>>> Le 18/08/2019 à 15:20, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >>>>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 10:48 AM Jacques Le Roux < > >>>>> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Le 18/08/2019 à 08:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >>>>>>> We could either add some notes about it to the README or consider > the > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Bintray approach introduced by Nicolas also for this release > branch. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> The Bintray approach sounds fine with me. We then need to update the > >>>>>> README.md > >>>>>> > >>>>> It would be great if Nicolas, or anyone else, could backport > >>>>> Nicolas' patch > >>>>> to the 16.11 release branch. > >>>> We need 1st to upload the 2.13 there. I don't know exactly how to do > >>>> that. It would be good to have the steps in the RM wiki page > >>>> > >>>> Jacques > >>>> > >>> I committed the files in the branch. Still needs to upload in Bintray > >>> > >>> Jacques > >>> > >>> >
