Thank you Michael,

please let me know when you are done; I know there are a few open tickets
in Jira and after a quick review I was inclined to to exclude them from
this release and proceed.

Regards,

Jacopo


On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:59 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>
wrote:

> Hi Jacopo,
>
> I think there are some issues open for 17.12.01, will check tomorrow.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> > Am 17.02.2020 um 12:33 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato <
> jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Ok, for now I am going to prepare the release files for "Apache OFBiz
> > 17.12.01", i.e. the full version with framework+plugins (similar to what
> we
> > have always released over the years) and then start the vote thread.
> Please
> > let me know if there are commits that needs to happen before and I will
> > wait for them.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> >> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jacopo Cappellato <
> >> jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the
> first
> >> release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the
> first
> >> one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a
> >> few decisions to take.
> >>
> >> Should we release two products or just one as in the past?
> >> Two products mean:
> >> "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01"
> >> and
> >> "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"
> >> One product mean"
> >> "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
> >>
> >> Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times;
> first
> >> publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year
> >> publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen
> then we
> >> could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the
> same
> >> release of the framework.
> >>
> >> One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones
> that
> >> we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to