Hi Guys,
If we don't release R20 it means that we will at best release R21 at the end of
2021, again a lot of years between 2018 and 2021.
I think we should release as much as possible, like the tendency is now and we
did before.
Jacques
Le 22/12/2020 à 08:52, Devanshu Vyas a écrit :
A big +1 to Michael's point for skipping R20 and make the R21 at the
beginning of the new year.
And for the 3years support of R17 and 5 years support starting with R18.
Thanks & Regards,
Devanshu Vyas.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:55 AM Deepak Dixit <dee...@apache.org> wrote:
3 years support of r17 and 5 years support starting with r18.
+1
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
ofbiz.apache.org
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:27 PM Michael Brohl <michael.br...@ecomify.de>
wrote:
+1 for the initial proposal
with an additional idea: maybe better skip r20 and make a r21 right at
the beginning of the year with the chance to release also in 21.
This would allow us to catch up and have a more up-to-date release
cycle. It seems a bit outdated to read that r18 is released in 2021...
What do you think?
Also +1 for 3 years support of r17 and 5 years support starting with r18.
Thanks,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 21.12.20 um 10:54 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi Deepak,
The reason I propose that is because it's more and more difficult to
backport to R17, when for R18 it's still OK. Also 3 years seems good
enough for me.
Of course if people think 5 years would be better then the backporting
question should be discussed...
We could revise that later, because there was much change between R17
an trunk and there are less and less now. So we could support R18 for
5 years
Jacques
Le 21/12/2020 à 10:38, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
+1
I have a question regarding the following point, rest looks good to
me.
What is the minimum supported year for a release?
Do we have any policy regarding this?
We should support a release for at least 5 year.
Thoughts?
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
ofbiz.apache.org
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 2:51 PM Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
