+1 to the original proposal and to the additional idea for skipping r20 and making an r21.
As discussed defining the 5 Years support policy will surely help. Best regards, Pranay Pandey On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 5:39 PM Aditya Sharma <adityasha...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 to the initial proposal of release > > 3 years of support for r17 and 5 years of support starting with r18 > sounds good to me. > I think we can define a policy well stated on our release page > > > > with an additional idea: maybe better skip r20 and make a r21 right at > > > the beginning of the year with the chance to release also in 21. > +1. We can think upon defining a timeline for stabilizing new release > branches with a tentative time period like maybe 3-12 months. There > are numerous new features that our users can benefit from and defining > certain timelines may reduce the wait time. > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Aditya Sharma > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jacques Le Roux > <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > > Le 22/12/2020 à 10:08, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : > > > If we don't release R20 it means that we will at best release R21 at > the end of 2021, again a lot of years between 2018 and 2021. > > > > OK forget it, OK this does not make sense, anyway it will be end of > 2021, OK for me for a brand new R21 :) > > > > But we need to release R18 ASAP... > > > > Jacques > > >
