[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12552252
 ] 

Joe Eckard commented on OFBIZ-1514:
-----------------------------------

I believe I used "1" - it just has to be different than the relevancy weight 
for the keyword "gizmo". Be sure to set your view size to 10 - this only occurs 
if the product is returned multiple times and on different pages, as each page 
of results is filtered for duplicates.

I'm attaching a seed data file that adds "gizmotron" to all of the gizmos for 
easier testing - drop this in after a clean install and keyword generation.

> Duplicates in Search Results
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-1514
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1514
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: product
>    Affects Versions: SVN trunk
>            Reporter: Joe Eckard
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> If a product has multiple keywords with identical roots and different 
> relevancy weights and the product is within a set of search results that span 
> multiple pages, then it will be duplicated in the results display. This is 
> because ProductSearch is doing a "distinct" on productId, relevancyWeight(s) 
> instead of grouping by the productId. (And the attempt at duplicate removal 
> only happens on a page-by-page basis.)
> I'm attaching a small proof-of-concept patch to make grouping by productId 
> the default - it appears to work well with various combinations of search 
> criteria (multiple keywords, features, feature cats, categories, etc.) but I 
> haven't done a tremendous amount of testing. (Only using PostgreSQL and Derby)
> From the comments in the ProductSearch code it looks like it was done this 
> way once, but it may have caused problems with Oracle. Does anyone know what 
> that problem was, or can anyone check this patch against oracle?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to