On Jun 24, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:

Looking at this more, I don't see why anyone would even use the Meters data the way it is set up now. It's kinda useless.

Wow, aren't we in a friendly mood...

If I want to maintain meter readings on a fixed asset, I should not have to create a fixed asset maintenance. I might want to log the copy count on a copier, or hours used on a projector. I should be able to keep a log of meter readings outside of creating maintenances.

On the other hand, a meter reading might trigger the creation of a fixed asset maintenance - if that meter reading crosses a maintenance threshold.

If no one objects, I'd like to refactor the meter reading code and data a little bit to make it more usable.

Is this a declaration that you're giving up on seeking to understand before you seek to be understood?

Either way, I look forward to hearing your thoughts on specific improvements.

You are correct that there is place to record an arbitrary meter reading... but from a business process perspective what would that actually be used for? When and why would that data be entered into the system?

-David


Adrian Crum wrote:
Fixed Assets has the ability to maintain meter readings for the asset. However, those meter readings can't be accessed without creating a fixed asset maintenance. It seems to me the meter readings link should be in the Fixed Asset sub navigation along with Identifications, Registrations, etc.
What do you think?
-Adrian

Reply via email to