So, should fixed asset maintenances in general be disabled when the fixed asset
isn't related to a product?
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 6/29/08, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anything the usefulness of a FixedAsset being associated
> with a
> Product should be emphasized more in the UI. For example in
> the
> maintenance area if the FixedAsset is not associated with a
> Product
> that it is an instance of, then there should be a warning
> message
> about that, and that also makes it clear that there is no
> maintenance
> schedule because of it, etc.
