It's a good question... and I'm not sure if we need to go that far. It
is conceivable that someone would want to track maintenance history
without planning for future maintenance, and so they wouldn't need the
Product and ProductMaint records.
-David
On Jun 29, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
So, should fixed asset maintenances in general be disabled when the
fixed asset isn't related to a product?
-Adrian
--- On Sun, 6/29/08, David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If anything the usefulness of a FixedAsset being associated
with a
Product should be emphasized more in the UI. For example in
the
maintenance area if the FixedAsset is not associated with a
Product
that it is an instance of, then there should be a warning
message
about that, and that also makes it clear that there is no
maintenance
schedule because of it, etc.
