Well, when you put it that way... Yes I think we should change the behavior and have it set the value to null if the list is null or empty. That seems totally reasonable.
-David On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:23:38 +1200, "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I noticed the <first-from-list> element does nothing if the list is > either null or empty (i.e. the field retains it's current value), I > was expecting that it would set the field to null. I would like to do > one of two things, either change the behaviour of the element or > document the element so that people are aware of its current > behaviour. > > Any opinions on which? > > Thanks > Scott
