Adrian, David, thanks for your input, I've made the relevant change in rev. 678116
Regards Scott 2008/7/19 David Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Well, when you put it that way... > > Yes I think we should change the behavior and have it set the value to null > if the list is null or empty. That seems totally reasonable. > > -David > > > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:23:38 +1200, "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I noticed the <first-from-list> element does nothing if the list is >> either null or empty (i.e. the field retains it's current value), I >> was expecting that it would set the field to null. I would like to do >> one of two things, either change the behaviour of the element or >> document the element so that people are aware of its current >> behaviour. >> >> Any opinions on which? >> >> Thanks >> Scott > >
