The only addition would be a note that a default was used if there were dated but they did not match.
Jacopo Cappellato sent the following on 9/24/2008 9:11 AM: > "convertUom" service, given a uomId (from) and a uomIdTo and an amount, > tries to convert the amount from uomId to uomIdTo. > In order to do this it searches for the conversion factor by looking in > the following entities: > > 1) UomConversion, if no record is found then > 2) UomConversionDated > > It seems to me that it would be better to reaserch the values in the > following order: > > 1) UomConversionDated, if no record is found then > 2) UomConversion > > The dated version should be more specific, if none is found then the > no-dated version is searched > > What do you think? > > Jacopo >
