+1 to Hudson.

在 2008-11-13四的 08:14 +0100,Jacques Le Roux写道:
> Yes and there one day hopefully we will be able to run some type of 
> Continuous Integration. At ASF most projects use Hudson
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_Integration
> http://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html
> http://wiki.apache.org/general/Hudson
> 
> Of course before that, as Adam outlined, we would have to have a more 
> reliable set of tests.
> Maybe, as David suggested, we could enforce our rules about that (no new 
> features without tests).
> I'm afraid this would drastically reduce contributions. Maybe it's better to 
> have less but more robust.
> 
> I agree that we need marketing, and I think we need as much tests.
> 
> Jacques
> 
> From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > Actually as we get OFBiz ready to run for OFBiz we'll have it hosted  
> > on ASF infra. The OFBiz resources that are not hosted on ASF infra are  
> > actually an issue right now that needs to be resolved at some point  
> > (ie confluence, nightly builds, demo site, etc).
> > 
> > -David
> > 
> > 
> > On Nov 13, 2008, at 12:13 AM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Enrique,
> >> I just bumped this thread up because using OFBiz itself in place of
> >> Confluence and even Jira has been discussed in the Apache Symposium
> >> (according to David's notes).
> >>
> >> I think that setting a server up and running is something HWM will do
> >> something about.
> >> On my end I will more than happy to help this happen and kept running.
> >>
> >> -Bruno
> >>
> >>
> >> 2008/11/13 Enrique Ruibal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Hello Bruno,
> >>>
> >>> What do you have in mind?, Is there something that can be started  
> >>> on your
> >>> end?
> >>>
> >>> How Can I help with Testing / Documenting stuff?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Enrique R.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>> http://www.nabble.com/Idea%3A-OFBiz-self-hosting-tp19235405p20471724.html
> >>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>>
> >

Reply via email to