I have read David's post and I understood that having BI in specialpurpose was not correct because it is a core module for an ERP. >From this I thought that having it in application could be ok and still have the framework easily isolable. -Bruno
2009/1/5 BJ Freeman <bjf...@free-man.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I think if you read davids comments included, that is the reason. > Framework you can have dependencies on, > Application you can not have framework depend on applications. > > Bruno Busco sent the following on 1/4/2009 1:48 PM: >> Hi Jacopo, >> I have moved the "bi" folder from the framework to "application" (not >> specialpurpose) and changed build.xml and component-load.xml. >> It seems to me that it works well there. >> >> Are there any specific reasons for having it in the framework folder >> and not moving to "application" folder? >> >> Thank you, >> -Bruno >> >> 2009/1/4 Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>: >>> Hi Bruno, >>> >>> these service calls are part of the quickInitDataWarehouse method that is >>> just a util method to simplify the BI setup for demo purposes: I know this >>> is not ideal and I agree that the method should be moved outside of the >>> framework. >>> But maybe for now we could leave it as is and just add a comment to it... it >>> is really useful in demos and testing. >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>> On Dec 26, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Bruno Busco wrote: >>> >>>> That's fine, >>>> we should then understand how to resolve some dependencies i.e. >>>> service calls like: >>>> <call-service service-name="loadAllProductsInProductDimension" >>>> in-map-name="inMap"/> >>>> or >>>> <call-service service-name="loadSalesInvoiceFact" >>>> in-map-name="inMap"/> >>>> that are defined in catalog and accounting components that (I guess) >>>> will not part of the framework. >>>> >>>> -Bruno >>>> >>>> 2008/12/26 David E. Jones <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>: >>>>> I think you misunderstand. The main bi stuff is just a tool, and really >>>>> belongs in the framework. Built on top of those tools are OOTB star >>>>> schema data models that can be used along with the OOTB operational data >>>>> model. Those belong with the base applications, along with reports that >>>>> are more generic in nature. Either way, most of the bi stuff is core to >>>>> OFBiz, and an important part of it (especially the star-schema and data >>>>> warehouse related parts), and is certainly not a peripheral add-on as >>>>> being in specialpurpose would imply. >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bruno Busco wrote: >>>>>> But maybe is better to move files using SVN in order to maintain >>>>>> history... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2008/12/25 Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>> If needed I can send a patch for this right now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2008/12/25 Bruno Busco <bruno.bu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> David, >>>>>>>> I was trying to move the BI folder from framework to specialpurpose >>>>>>>> and, once changed the build.xml and component-load.xml files, >>>>>>>> it seems to build and work well. >>>>>>>> Could we move it in order to simplify the framework-only deploy? >>>>>>>> -Bruno >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2008/12/25 David E. Jones <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>: >>>>>>>>> The placement of BI in the diagram is based on the original >>>>>>>>> implementation, which was not part of the framework as it is now. BI >>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>> kind of a funny one and while there are tools for BI in the >>>>>>>>> framework, >>>>>>>>> and base data structures within the base applications, it can really >>>>>>>>> exist in applications, specialpurpose, or hot-deploy/add-on >>>>>>>>> components. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Bruno Busco wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Thank you David, >>>>>>>>>> I did not see this page before and it helps very much. >>>>>>>>>> I will take this as a Christmas present from you. ;-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BTW, so this confirms that party should be out of the framework and >>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>> should remove all dependences on it from the framework (not adding >>>>>>>>>> more). >>>>>>>>>> Then I see that the BI also is out of the framework (and this is ok) >>>>>>>>>> but in my framework-only installation that I got deleting the >>>>>>>>>> applications and specialourpose folders from a full trunk checkout >>>>>>>>>> BI >>>>>>>>>> is there but of couurse not working. >>>>>>>>>> Could we think of moving BI files from framework to specialpurpose >>>>>>>>>> folder? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Bruno >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2008/12/25 David E Jones <david.jo...@hotwaxmedia.com>: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The decision has already been made, and even documented (a miracle, >>>>>>>>>>> yes I >>>>>>>>>>> know). For details see: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/Component+and+Component+Set+Dependencies >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Now we just need to stick to it... so thanks for bringing this up >>>>>>>>>>> Bruno. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -David >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 25, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Bruno Busco wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> this change sets an additional dependence of the framework from >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> Party application. >>>>>>>>>>>> We should definitively take a decition on how to separate the >>>>>>>>>>>> framework. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Bruno >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2008/12/25 <hans...@apache.org>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Author: hansbak >>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed Dec 24 22:26:14 2008 >>>>>>>>>>>>> New Revision: 729396 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729396&view=rev >>>>>>>>>>>>> Log: >>>>>>>>>>>>> OFBIZ-2097: show organizationPartyId in header(can be set in >>>>>>>>>>>>> preferences), rewrote financial history to show currencies, >>>>>>>>>>>>> invoice/p[aymentworker now can show in actual and >>>>>>>>>>>>> organizationparty currency >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Added: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/UnAppliedInvoicesForParty.groovy >>>>>>>>>>>>> (with props) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/UnAppliedPaymentsForParty.groovy >>>>>>>>>>>>> (with props) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Modified: >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/AccountingUiLabels.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/invoice/InvoiceWorker.java >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/src/org/ofbiz/accounting/payment/PaymentWorker.java >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/WEB-INF/actions/invoice/EditInvoice.groovy >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/invoice/InvoiceForms.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/webapp/accounting/payment/PaymentForms.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/InvoiceScreens.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/widget/Menus.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/WEB-INF/actions/party/PartyFinancialHistory.groovy >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/webapp/partymgr/party/PartyForms.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/widget/partymgr/PartyScreens.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/widget/partymgr/ProfileScreens.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/CommonUiLabels.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/webcommon/includes/header.ftl >>>>>>>>>>>>> ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/widget/CommonScreens.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFJYV4OrP3NbaWWqE4RApKFAKCHbPfHV8qwnPhdUvVdO6OiGhuejACbBaQS > m2jKte9yyaZuQ3HEhoOpxwU= > =bFu4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
