> I don't really think that is relevant, permission
> services were an improvement to the existing security
> framework, designing a new framework doesn't invalidate
> an improvement to the old one.
Of course it is relevant! Do we need to continue to design things that
ultimately have to be redesigned? "Those who ignore history are doomed to
repeat it."
What is the problem here? Are you that convinced that Andrew's implementation
is perfect? That there's no room for improvement or other opinions?
-Adrian
