Scott, thank you for the tests and report, I am on it now and will fix it soon. I was confused by the fact that the errors were not logged under the test log files in runtime/logs folder... I will try to investigate this further.
Jacopo On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > Sorry Jacopo, it's still failing: > [JUNIT] Results for test suite: accountingtests [java] 2009-11-24 > 10:34:33,958 (main) > [JUNIT] Pass: false | # Tests: 16 | # Failed: 14 # Errors: 0 > Regards > Scott > > On 24/11/2009, at 11:30 PM, Scott Gray wrote: > >> Thanks Jacopo, your revision is compiling now on buildbot, the suspense is >> killing me :-) >> >> I know about the entity test failing, it shouldn't affect buildbot though >> because that test only fails after the first run. It's a problem with the >> test delegator not catching some async service entity operations so som >> records are left over from previous test runs. I think that is caused by >> the JobManager being instantiated with a normal delegator during startup so >> no entity operations performed by it are caught by the test suite >> delegators. I've got a fix in mind but need to think about it a bit more. >> >> Thanks again >> Scott >> >> On 24/11/2009, at 11:11 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >>> Ok, >>> >>> I have fixed the accounting test that was failing. >>> >>> BTW, there is still this entitytest that is logged as "failure" (I don't >>> think it is related to the work I did on accounting data): >>> >>> <testcase classname="org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite" >>> name="testMakeValue" time="0.189"> >>> <failure message="4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but >>> was:<13>" >>> type="junit.framework.AssertionFailedError">junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: >>> 4 TestingTypes found expected:<4> but was:<13> >>> at >>> org.ofbiz.entity.test.EntityTestSuite.testMakeValue(EntityTestSuite.java:81) >>> at org.ofbiz.testtools.TestRunContainer.start(TestRunContainer.java:146) >>> at >>> org.ofbiz.base.container.ContainerLoader.start(ContainerLoader.java:100) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startStartLoaders(Start.java:271) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.startServer(Start.java:321) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.start(Start.java:325) >>> at org.ofbiz.base.start.Start.main(Start.java:410) >>> </failure> >>> </testcase> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> >>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 8:46 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>> >>>> I think a few people were trying to test it out, I just fixed a bug that >>>> Jacques introduced this morning :-) >>>> >>>> Thanks Jacopo, ping me if you need any help, it's only been a couple of >>>> days since I was working on those tests. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Scott >>>> >>>> On 24/11/2009, at 8:39 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 6:13 AM, Scott Gray wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I did actually expect the build to fail, Jacopo committed some data >>>>>> changes yesterday that the accounting tests depend on but I'll get them >>>>>> fixed up tonight. After that you're all on your own, you break it you >>>>>> fix it :-) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I could try to say that I was just testing the new build notification >>>>> mechanism :-) >>>>> Please Scott, don't work on this, I am fixing them now. >>>>> >>>>> Jacopo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Scott >>>>>> >>>>>> HotWax Media >>>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24/11/2009, at 6:32 PM, build...@apache.org wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The Buildbot has detected a failed build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot. >>>>>>> Full details are available at: >>>>>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/1829 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Build Reason: forced: by IRC user <gmcdonald> on channel #asftest: >>>>>>> testing new config as requested in INFRA-2345 >>>>>>> Build Source Stamp: HEAD >>>>>>> Blamelist: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BUILD FAILED: failed compile_1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> sincerely, >>>>>>> -The Buildbot >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
