Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Personnally, I see more harms than benefits as time goes by. I think > it's time for a vote.
+1 to remove > If we don't remove it we should at least take care of issues like the > one we just crossed with JavaDoc. Actually, I can't see any other kind > of issues, so simply commenting out JavaDoc targets in /shark/build.xml > (with a comment about like in framework/build.xml) would be sufficient > in this case. Well, I've made it compile, which should fix basic parse issues with javadoc. > If we remove it, we could attach an archive of the component at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-552. And as David said > (thanks for the links Scott), we should do the same for the workflow > component which is even older... Don't need to attach an archive. It'll exist in svn history.
