Okay never mind, I realize now we're talking about the download button on the build page and not the main page.

Regards
Scott

On 8/12/2009, at 11:59 AM, Scott Gray wrote:

The download button links to build.ofbiz.org which displays trunk,
9.04 and 4.0.
The only thing I see missing are descriptions of the three.

Regards
Scott

HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com


On 8/12/2009, at 11:51 AM, David E Jones wrote:


The point is we need more than one so people can choose, and are
more aware that there is a choice.

-David


On Dec 7, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:

Most of the major projects have a big DOWNLOAD button - it's a good
idea - and I'd be surprised if a call to action does not encourage
more people to download.

Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

On Dec 7, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:

From: "David E Jones" <d...@me.com>
I suppose we are shameless optimists and hope that people will
choose to collaborate with other people using the software, and
perhaps even participate in the development.

Still, I agree the big download button is a bad design and I
never liked it given that there are various options to download
and personally I like the idea of making people make choices... ;)

If number of people don't like it, then it should be discussed

Jacques
()  ascii ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org

-David


On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:

HI David:
If that resource is the "definitive" answer, then why does that
"BIG FAT DOWNLOAD" button/link point to a "trunk" build?
Shouldn't it point to a "release branch tag" build with a good
probability of working?
Am I missing something here?
Am I not reading all this information correctly?
Why does that button point to a build using Java 1.6 when that
couldn't possibly be a build that has any history of testing
behind it..you just started using Java 1.6 after all.

TIA
Ruth

David E Jones wrote:
This page might be helpful, and answers the more general
question behind the question:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Apache+OFBiz+Getting+Started

-David


On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:05 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:


Hi Anil:
I feel like I'm spitting in the wind here...Please, let's just
start this conversation over again. Under the following
circumstances, which version or release of OFBiz should I use?

I'm a new user and I want to customize my OFBiz instance for a
new ERP deployment.

TIA
Ruth
Find me on the web at http://www.myofbiz.com or Google Keyword
"myofbiz"




Anil Patel wrote:

Ruth,
Why don't you consider using one of the release branches?

Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword
"ofbiz"

On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:


Hi Scott:
Then stop the committing and do some reviewing. There is
more to software development than committing code to a
repository.

This is interesting perspective. Trunk is expected to remain
active. New development must continue. For the people who
needs more stable version we do have release branch.



Regards,
Ruth

Scott Gray wrote:

On 7/12/2009, at 10:22 PM, Jeroen van der Wal wrote:


Thank you Jacques for addressing this as this situation
worries me
too. Although I think the power of the Ofbiz community can
handle it
:-)

My suggestions would be:
- Assign volunteers and a lead to each of the components.
They can
watch issues of their components and should can be
consulted if
anybody wants to make changes in their neighbourhood.

We already have these volunteers, they're called people who
review commits and I could probably count them on one hand.
Everything you've suggested requires more resources than
this community can provide.


- Work bottom up: start with the framework, then the core
modules
(party, product, accounting, workeffort, manufactureing,
order) and
finally the specialpurpose modules (I personally consider
humanres and
marketing to be specialpurpose)
- Communicate changes to dependent components so they can
sanitize
their components
- Don't allow code without tests
- Use branching for work in progress to maintain a stable
trunk (I
prefer Git over SVN but that's another topic...)

I'm a big fan of branching, this explains why:
- Code each task (or related set of tasks) in its own
branch, then you
will have the flexibility of when you would like to merge
these tasks
and perform a release.
- QA should be done on each branch before it is merged to
the trunk.
- By doing QA on each individual branch, you will know
exactly what
caused the bug easier.
- This solution scales to any number of developers.
- This method works since branching is an almost instant
operation in SVN.
- Tag each release that you perform.
- You can develop features that you don't plan to release
for a while
and decide exactly when to merge them.
- For all work you do, you can have the benefit of
committing your
code. If you work out of the trunk only, you will probably
keep your
code uncommitted a lot, and hence unprotected and without
automatic
history.
If you try to do the opposite and do all your development
in the trunk
you'll be plagged by:
- Constant build problems for daily builds
- Productivity loss when a a developer commits a problem
for all other
people on the project
- Longer release cycles, because you need to finally get a
stable version
- Less stable releases

Best,

Jeroen van der Wal

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jacques Le Roux
<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

Hi,

I'd like to express a feeling I have. Actually it's not
only my own feeling but also something some users have
expressed recently.

I'm quite happy to see that these last times a lot of
effort have been made in order to fix OFBiz (yes to fix
OFBiz!)
It's really great to see new features in OFBiz. But I
really wonder if we should not slow down the pace in
integrating new features for a short period of time and
should not make and even greatest effort to have a more
stable OFBiz.

There are 180 bugs opened in Jira. Don't you think it's
time for the community to have a look at them and to fix
the most important ones (109 are considered as at least
important) ?

Thanks

Jacques














--Apple-Mail-27-599191100
Content-Disposition: attachment;
        filename=smime.p7s
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature;
        name=smime.p7s
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJLzCCAu4w
ggJXoAMCAQICEEUo30GQgNPA2unhFQTCih0wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkEx
JTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQ
ZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA4MDkxNDIzNTkyN1oXDTA5MDkxNDIzNTky
N1owTDEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJlcjEpMCcGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYac2Nv
dHQuZ3JheUBob3R3YXhtZWRpYS5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDa
e08ezN/8GVs5usYCe+wO9CZeWfvu5RGvlvKmJV5Rq3QpUn63a2YR277pnaip1c1A/ kBMCkrO0X+7 dcxN39hOp5mHk85BUSoQ363mGmV6AHV23npCXnSI/ uZCeDJ06a94syZy5KKBaz6dhW5M381MjAt4 fqwsKenlVy7EwPIFshEyQ+yo6pcXi7rNbheZylnUKIeM93mhhhwNlRWaJOu5+Wtk/ MHfoL56X/oN kWyX0yqHSrYKJa8qUuCkyI4SBXGB4OEeDjlVBw1MG7M3KMWzOZoZcc34DCJWEsbF4PWygxCk +iS6
NlTpBG1tOURv9cDkyCiUGTvJS1jN53xaJSiBAgMBAAGjNzA1MCUGA1UdEQQeMByBGnNjb3R0Lmdy
YXlAaG90d2F4bWVkaWEuY29tMAwGA1UdEwEB/ wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADgYEALQ8XQrMm yICirLOcKW7r5vGfI2bAB5tr9ru19Za3cYAmHSMRb8WucjuD5ELAkyyvLtPE/ 6l0YykhgRDT6+cv y1XbFlxtxoerPPEuPcR6Gj75j5FYxVS7Rj3QtT2QObaWSyT9jzEhoC+ +CBYEAsN2yal3ltIrXtq4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 6VXXSvOV UDjLScp4A75Sr5R +b13PB8C8jNyLH68azc2epm8DNXlNgWyEmDMweQZg44ni3usUO7EASj1d3EmW 0wMgz7Oapv5o94wwR8p8+bEinBwxL0wJrm6Q9vJp0TjkqiLLQKQvHpxa/8zAjKHy/ OQ8TpKjoyZV 9MVHbzq02iqn5NUno2SbUoNIGeTNk5H2of9vwCxlVykod3HHh8Lj98jL7 /7mJZUGQUWYh3ob0wT+ qhBDTcWAtSzeGYP2A4ePjInitrzBDVIr +Kn60eSSpGgJfAOxMiOvAgMBAAGjggIcMIICGDAfBgNV
HSMEGDAWgBSJgmd9xJ0mcABLtFBIfN49rgRufTAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUrhh4ET8b7tP1VRzP1Jh9LVFD
trAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/ wQCMAAwIAYDVR0lBBkwFwYIKwYBBQUHAwQGCysG AQQBsjEBAwUCMBEGCWCGSAGG +EIBAQQEAwIFIDBGBgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEBATAr
MCkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3VyZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzCBpQYDVR0fBIGdMIGa
MEygSqBIhkZodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudEF1dGhl
bnRpY2F0aW9uYW5kRW1haWwuY3JsMEqgSKBGhkRodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvVVROLVVT
RVJGaXJzdC1DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZEVtYWlsLmNybDBsBggrBgEFBQcBAQRgMF4w
NgYIKwYBBQUHMAKGKmh0dHA6Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL1VUTkFBQUNsaWVudENBLmNydDAk
BggrBgEFBQcwAYYYaHR0cDovL29jc3AuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tMCUGA1UdEQQeMByBGnNjb3R0Lmdy
YXlAaG90d2F4bWVkaWEuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCes4gpV/Q8+st+Q/ Mow6pxHKAa 5G1jzHpExbjASPI+zls8/ QAyKJ9cIFhgLgypGg4v0YsRLMfFpREm3CV9eXoKiAodPSrc4zYNxuiB RxbWR+y5JfVV9M60tk+NPcMlVlBHpARZyClbk8ITWs7CC5/J5cBFjdBKAM4gzbrZTh +Rfhte9d/a DItjn2PaiuR1J/VXFVwsu9i3gqPwAbWUQZ69dhWk+lepn1sAb0t+TU6STlj0tP5hLkt/ oEHDsQN0 PnjYWwI/Pk0Oo+NbgLIOzsXt+ljy4LSMgxJOTEWhQWZ6JJBKNpvkFX6uGuGnGIl +r3ifncQzUsy8 Gz/ hviGAlwFIMYIDXzCCA1sCAQEwgcQwga4xCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUG
A1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoTFVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8G
A1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3QuY29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNs
aWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgRW1haWwCEQDYl7EXGWhQIpBs19Ozq1G2MAkGBSsOAwIa
BQCgggFvMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTA5MTIwNzIy
NTkwOVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFFUwkLjzCT0mM3cAiQe4Tmu5BI +sMIGFBgkrBgEEAYI3EAQx
eDB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQu
MSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQRSjfQZCA08Da
6eEVBMKKHTCBhwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxeKB2MGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3
dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1h
aWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQQIQRSjfQZCA08Da6eEVBMKKHTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQCue863ycw + EYOJw6iNMuzAhKkXZoXkSPG5dNLo91tmmDpZmGj/ODfHVeTnEYXADWXLGkmoWaEyUcgn +x05WXGk svzHPPpS/ 5tLziVmOzeAaK07UcKXPPM7xsMcgwv68527TsI3LDUpRr3D82OSCFlIEgblSS1OXFeZ 5ef+wgoDBemI8mYKlqXaQc/ 5ELENyOtNEKf5S91rNcTNvKxLivkDirZFTEMGo1lOeoYHbNczwxwY o6RKWPCr/ Je287RViC09lVFWcfGUniqJTSIs0YMZgkirGZt6NkmRIdORIkWIPxokF2iChf+nsaU7
1uCkSp7s+DLvN8wbhaK1gOlKIb+MAAAAAAAA

--Apple-Mail-27-599191100--

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to