First, I must say that maybe my view is biased because I have no time to look
at git and I'm a bit jealous :/
My point was that it allows you to work a long time alone on a (possibly large)
task.
And even if you break it after in several svn commits it's still a lot of commit to review in a single shoot.
I agree it's easier than a large svn commit though.
I understand that having a big work to do it's certainly better to use git.
The only point which concern me is that needs, at least, some collaboration/exchanges before diving in lonesome work.
Maybe practice will show how to do it better.
But as I said I'm still far from being ready to switch from svn to git.
Hope I have passed my feeling
Cheers
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray" <[email protected]>
That's not how git is being used, it simply allows you to easily break
up a single task into multiple more logically separated commits, which
actually makes for easier reviews.
It is possible to do what you are suggesting but I don't think that is
what is actually happening.
Regards
Scott
On 11/12/2009, at 11:24 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I wonder if the "sleeping giant" is not using Git and will flood us
sooner or later.
That's one of the dark aspect of git usage. You are able to commit a
lot in a single shoot, hard to review.
Nothing is perfect is this world
Jacques
From: "Bruno Busco" <[email protected]>
Hi,
Any step from the "sleeping giant" ? ;-)
-Bruno
2009/11/25 Tim Ruppert <[email protected]>:
Right now sleeping giant means not yet committed to the project :)
Definitely looking for this look and feel to make it's way in
there Erik -
thanks so much! I'm glad you've found the right avenue for that
style.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 25, 2009, at 2:13 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
uhao!
That's great!
Now I see what you meant by "sleeping giant" !
-Bruno
2009/11/25 Adam Heath <[email protected]>:
http://www.brainfood.com/ofbizbackend
