Scott Gray wrote: > On 16/12/2009, at 11:26 AM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> Any progress on this? If not I think we should consider reverting, not >>> being able to work on groovy scripts at runtime is a bit of pain for >>> development. >> >> Does that mean you've confirmed it then? > > Oh yeah sorry, confirmed. It doesn't appear to be a problem with our > cache but with the GroovyClassLoader.
Well, it appears that ofbiz is using groovy wrongly. A new GroovyClassLoader should be created for each parsed class. Then, when UtilCache clears out each entry, it'll get recompiled as appropriate. FlexibleStringExpander reuses the public GroovyUtil.groovyClassLoader; that needs to be fixed. Then, GroovyUtil can be fixed simply, along with seleniumxml.GroovyRunner.
