On Dec 28, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > From: "Ean Schuessler" <e...@brainfood.com> >> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> Thanks, I saw that but was not sure how to use it. I remember now why I >>> created Java services. I needed to create a PartyGroup. So initially I >>> looked for a service and found createPartyGroup wich is implemented by a >>> method in PartyServices.java. Then I continued in Java :/. >>> Now I wonder what we should do regarding your sentence <<I've thought a >>> few times that maybe it's not the best idea to do so, and instead >>> whenever a party is implied to be in a role if they are not already then >>> they should be added automatically.>> in >>> http://markmail.org/message/j5yprwdv3fgz3rb6 >> I always took this to be a security thing, that a role must be >> authorized before it can be used in relationships and other structures. > > If the aplication needs to create a PartyRole, I can't see any reasons to not > let it do it automatically
The original idea was to use this as an extra protection, ie so users don't describe a party's relationship with something else using a certain role if the party isn't really in that role. The result, however, is that it is cumbersome, a real pain, and a common complaint... which is why I'm for changing the default behavior. -David
