--- On Sat, 1/30/10, Adam Heath <doo...@brainfood.com> wrote:
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r904921 - in 
> /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base: test/BaseUnitTests.java 
> util/string/UelUtil.java
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, January 30, 2010, 4:36 PM
> adri...@apache.org
> wrote:
> > Author: adrianc
> > Date: Sun Jan 31 00:08:14 2010
> > New Revision: 904921
> > 
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=904921&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Some changes to the UEL integration. While attempting
> to upgrade the JUEL library, some flaws in my original code
> were exposed. This commit fixes them. Also, I added some
> more unit tests.
> 
> I would have split this commit into several.
> 
> > Modified:
> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/string/UelUtil.java
> > URL: 
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/string/UelUtil.java?rev=904921&r1=904920&r2=904921&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > ---
> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/string/UelUtil.java
> (original)
> > +++
> ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/util/string/UelUtil.java
> Sun Jan 31 00:08:14 2010
> > @@ -120,9 +120,11 @@
> >      }
> >  
> >      protected static class
> BasicContext extends ELContext {
> > +        protected final
> Map<String, Object> variables;
> >          protected final
> VariableMapper variableMapper;
> >          public
> BasicContext(Map<String, ? extends Object> context) {
> > -           
> this.variableMapper = new BasicVariableMapper(context,
> this);
> > +           
> this.variableMapper = new BasicVariableMapper(this);
> > +           
> this.variables = UtilGenerics.cast(context);
> 
> This is wrong.  You've converted a read only map to a
> writable one.
> The syntax on context means that BasicContext doesn't
> insert new
> items, nor replace any items in context.
> 
> If you really need to modify variable, then change the
> generics markup
> on context.

I appreciate the review and comments, but I think you're not understanding the 
integration. I can't change the method signature because it is part of the JSR 
245 specification, and yes, I really need to write to the context because that 
is the whole point of the integration.





Reply via email to