On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 17/02/2010, at 4:09 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> David E Jones wrote: >>>> Adam, >>>> >>>> Maybe you didn't notice, but this was a single commit from over a year ago. >>> What does the timeframe of the commit have to do with my question? >>> There was a license header, now there isn't, and I checked trunk first >>> before sending my question, to see if it had been added in the mean time. >>> >> >> My guess is that the file was modified automatically by Eclipse (hence the >> license removal) during David's development work and was committed when he >> committed that work, accidentally or otherwise. >> >> If it bothers you then add it back, I don't think we've really got anything >> in that file in terms of new work and the header isn't entirely necessary >> IMO. > > Apache requires it.
Adam, I think Scott's point is that since you care so much about it, why didn't you just fix it while you were taking a look at it? Maybe you were hoping to teach me something by commenting on that? You know, inline with your recent comments about your teaching position and community interaction style? I think I've got a better idea for this file: why don't we get rid of it? If no one disagrees, and no one beats me to it, I'll take care of that later. -David
