Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> [email protected] wrote: >>> Author: jacopoc >>> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010 >>> New Revision: 925342 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342&view=rev >>> Log: >>> Improved search capabilities of the work effort calendar screens; converted >>> ftl template to form widget. >> This should have been 2 commits, they aren't related. >> > > I enhanced the search features by replacing the existing ftl forms (one for > each search field) with *one* single widget form: in this way searches can be > done with multiple constraints. > Are you saying that instead I should have: > > 1) converted the ftl forms into widget forms in order to preserve the > original limitations > 2) aggregate the widget forms into one widget form in order to implement the > new feature > > ? > > This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard. Or maybe it is a new > *policy*?
I also only said should, not must. Those are terms I've been familiar with because of the Debian Policy Manual; they based those terms on what RFC stuff does.
