Scott Gray wrote: > On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> Scott Gray wrote: >>> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me. >> Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed? > > All I did was turn off the inventory requirement during the condition > checking, it was not a generic solution that would have incorporated both > strategies.
Bother, thought you might say that. I'm still toying around at the idea stage, might send my thoughts next week.
