On 19/03/2010, at 5:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > Scott Gray wrote: >> On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote: >> >>> Scott Gray wrote: >>>> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me. >>> Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed? >> >> All I did was turn off the inventory requirement during the condition >> checking, it was not a generic solution that would have incorporated both >> strategies. > > Bother, thought you might say that. > > I'm still toying around at the idea stage, might send my thoughts next > week. >
You could always just add a new promo action type that doesn't require inventory so that you've got one with and one without. Regards Scott
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
