On 31/03/2010, at 9:45 AM, jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Wed Mar 31 15:45:07 2010 > New Revision: 929593 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=929593&view=rev > Log: > Completes r929503: adds a relation between facility and uom for > facilitySizeUomId > > Modified: > ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > > Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=929593&r1=929592&r2=929593&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) > +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Wed Mar 31 > 15:45:07 2010 > @@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ under the License. > <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_GEOPT" > rel-entity-name="GeoPoint"> > <key-map field-name="geoPointId"/> > </relation> > + <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_SUOM" title="Size" > rel-entity-name="Uom"> > + <key-map field-name="facilitySizeUomId" rel-field-name="uomId"/> > + </relation>
I think ideally the title would be FacilitySize wouldn't it?
facility.getRelatedOne("FacilitySizeUom");
seems more intuitive than
facility.getRelatedOne("SizeUom");
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
