Right! I will change that...
Jacques
From: "Scott Gray" <scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com>
Author: jleroux
Date: Wed Mar 31 15:45:07 2010
New Revision: 929593
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=929593&view=rev
Log:
Completes r929503: adds a relation between facility and uom for
facilitySizeUomId
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=929593&r1=929592&r2=929593&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original)
+++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Wed Mar 31
15:45:07 2010
@@ -1034,6 +1034,9 @@ under the License.
<relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_GEOPT"
rel-entity-name="GeoPoint">
<key-map field-name="geoPointId"/>
</relation>
+ <relation type="one" fk-name="FACILITY_SUOM" title="Size"
rel-entity-name="Uom">
+ <key-map field-name="facilitySizeUomId" rel-field-name="uomId"/>
+ </relation>
I think ideally the title would be FacilitySize wouldn't it?
facility.getRelatedOne("FacilitySizeUom");
seems more intuitive than
facility.getRelatedOne("SizeUom");
