My guess is that since we've increased the frequency of building tests that 
this being a case by case basis would be a pain.  I think adding tests to 
document and improve stability should always be allowed.  My two cents.

Cheers,
Ruppert

On May 1, 2010, at 10:17 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:

> I don't see why we need a new "policy." In the past, only bug fixes were 
> applied to release branches, and any other changes were discussed on a 
> case-by-case basis. That process seems to have worked well so far.
> 
> -Adrian
> 
> --- On Sat, 5/1/10, Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Anil Patel <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> Subject: Re: New branch is now available for upcoming releases of 10.04 
>> series
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Cc: "Anil Patel" <anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> Date: Saturday, May 1, 2010, 7:47 AM
>> Keep asking, If there are enough
>> reason, we may come up with some policy that allows for it.
>> 
>> 
>> Or 
>> may be we create one more release branch as soon as in next
>> two months and kill this branch in its alpha stage itself. 
>> 
>> Thanks and Regards
>> Anil Patel
>> HotWax Media Inc
>> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword
>> "ofbiz"
>> 
>> On May 1, 2010, at 5:16 AM, chris snow wrote:
>> 
>>> It would be good if we could backport the field
>> tooltip messages too.
>>> 
>>> Many thanks, chris
>>> 
>>> On 1 May 2010 09:59, "Vikas Mayur" <vikasma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks Jacopo for all of your hard work to make it
>> happen.
>>> 
>>> Btw I am not sure if this is a good question to you
>> (and others of course)
>>> about commit policy to the release branch.
>>> 
>>> We all know that the main idea behind the release
>> branch is to provide a
>>> more stable version of OFBiz.
>>> 
>>> I was just wondering if we could also change the
>> commit policy to back port
>>> unit test besides bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> This way there would be more code coverage with the
>> additional unit tests
>>> resulted by backporting to the release branch.
>>> 
>>> I am sorry if this has been already discussed in
>> past.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Vikas
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
>> <
>>> jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ...
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to