Adrian Crum wrote: > 2010-06-25 12:32:26,939 (main) [ ContainerLoader.java:50 :INFO ] [Startup] > Loading containers... > > ... > > 2010-06-25 12:32:54,251 (main) [ BeanShellContainer.java:102:INFO ] NOTICE: > BeanShell service ports are not secure. Please protect the ports > 2010-06-25 12:32:57,939 (org.ofbiz.service.jms.jmslistenerfact...@14664e4) [ > JmsListenerFactory.java:74 :INFO ] JMS Listener Factory Thread Finished; All > listeners connected. > > 31 seconds isn't fast enough?
No. Older ofbiz started in 10s(595296 version). And that's without any parallelization. Faster startup means it's quicker to run tests. Being able to run tests faster means they aren't such a burden to run, which means they will get run more often when code is being developed. It reduces downtimes when servers need to be restarted. Hosting multiple ofbiz, where each one takes longer to start, means that all those times add up. Multiply that by many companys/users, many of their own installations, and the time savings are not just theorhetical. We've probably got 40 ofbiz installs. Plus, the synchronization improvements are not just about startup time. They improve the system once it is actually up and running.