Yes , you are right but the problem is not of position, the problem is that
, when I use the <auto-field-service/> tag then fields are arranged in the
way in which they are declared in entity , and if I want to give them
position then fields are not arranged in the required position , (you can
take the example of updatePerson service ).


Regards
Ravi

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Vikas Mayur <[email protected]>wrote:

> To position some of the fields in a separate column you would need to
> explicitly define those fields and with a position attribute on it.
>
> Regards
> Vikas
>
>
> On Jun 24, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Ravindra Mandre wrote:
>
>  Yes , I also tried the sort-order but this does not fulfill the
>> requirement
>> , as suppose I want to arrange two fields in a horizontal way , then this
>> does not work . for example  :
>> A)
>> firstName                                                       lastName
>>
>>
>>
>> but sort-order does like this
>> B)
>> firstName
>> lastName
>>
>> , if there is any other way for doing case A please let me know .
>>
>> Ravi
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  Did you try also sort-order?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Ravindra Mandre" <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Yes , when we use auto-fields-service in a form then, this does not allow
>>>
>>>> us
>>>> to arrange the fields as we want , means position tag inside the field
>>>> becomes useless .
>>>>
>>>> Ravi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, it's not related to auto-fields-service. I was able to extend
>>>>
>>>>> another form which uses auto-fields-service
>>>>> I will dig in when I will get time...
>>>>>
>>>>> Forget it
>>>>>
>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like extending a form which uses auto-fields-service does not
>>>>> work
>>>>>
>>>>>  properly. Has someone some experience witht that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to