We think its interesting and handy to manage our web content using GIT.
Its hard to do that with JackRabbit, especially in its preferred
configuration of a database backed store. I think that is a pretty
reasoned explanation. I don't see Adam or I casting stones at your CMS
test application so please consider lightening up. Thanks. :-D
Scott Gray wrote:
> To be honest it makes it a little difficult to take you seriously when you
> completely disregard the JCR/Jackrabbit approach without even the slightest
> hint of objectivity
> if (!myWay) {
> return highway;
> }
> The JCR was produced by an expert working group driven largely by Day
> Software which has Roy T. Fielding as their chief scientist. While I know
> next to nothing about what constitutes a great CMS infrastructure I cannot
> simply accept that you are right and they are wrong especially when you make
> no attempt whatsoever to paint the full picture, I mean are you suggesting
> that a file system based CMS has no downsides? Your approach is filled with
> pros and their's all cons?
>
--
Ean Schuessler, CTO
e...@brainfood.com
214-720-0700 x 315
Brainfood, Inc.
http://www.brainfood.com
