Here's the history: http://svn.ofbiz.org/viewcvs?rev=4536&view=rev
If it no longer depends on party then I don't see an issue with moving it back. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 23/12/2010, at 11:57 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > I have run into a HUGE obstacle in the process of moving security-related UI > artifacts to the framework - they call services defined in > applications/securityext. Indeed, they call ALL of the services defined in > securityext. > > The securityext component depends on the entity and service components, so it > needs to be loaded after those, but I can't see any reason why securityext > needs to be in the applications folder. > > I think the securityext component should be in the framework folder. What do > you think? > > -Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
