Doing is a lot more work than talking, I don't think it would be a good idea to change our existing processes based on the hope of change.
Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 28/01/2011, at 9:17 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > I know... > > Maybe we shouldn't do a mayor release like 11 when it is based on current > technology and frame work, but continue on the 10.x branch. > > And have the new release, whether that is 11, 15 or NG, based on new > approaches and insights as stated/discussed in other threads. > > Regards, > > Pierre. > > 2011/1/28 David E Jones <d...@me.com> > >> >> Release "10" was actually the release branch 10.04 because it was branched >> from the trunk in April 2010. >> >> The next release will probably be something like 11.04, because it will >> proba > > > > >> bly be branched in April 2011. However, if it was branched next month the >> release would be 11.02. >> >> If you look at the history you'll notice that there was a release 4.0, but >> then the next release branch was 09.04. >> >> -David >> >> >> On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: >> >>> WootWoot. Hurray for 10 years OFBiz... >>> >>> How convenient that release 10 coincides. Maybe we could hold a contest >> to >>> get a logo that commemorates the aniversary. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Pierre >>> >>> 2011/1/27 David E Jones <d...@me.com> >>> >>>> >>>> The project was created on SourceForge.net on 13 May 2001. I don't know >>>> when the first commit was. >>>> >>>> The first preview release (still available on SourceForge) was >>>> "ofbiz-2001.05.24.zip" which, as the name implies, was released on 24 >> May >>>> 2001. Obviously I had been working on the data model and other aspects >> of >>>> the project well before the 13 May when the project was officially >> created >>>> on SourceForge, and because of that the first main commit had a fair >> amount >>>> in it. >>>> >>>> The early stuff ran on JBoss and all of the entities were used to >> generate >>>> code including container managed EJBs, JSPs for each entity (like the >>>> current Entity Data Maintenance), etc. It is a testament to the folly of >> the >>>> code generation approach for large projects. The generated code was over >> 1 >>>> million lines, if I remember right. >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>> >>>>> the earlist copy of ofbiz i have is in 2002 >>>>> the earliest date I have for cvs is 8/15/2003 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ========================= >>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < >>>> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>> >>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> David E Jones sent the following on 1/27/2011 11:24 AM: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm looking around a little for the old CVS repo on SourceForge (which >>>> is what OFBiz started with, wasn't much SVN available in those days), >> and I >>>> think it may be gone. >>>>>> >>>>>> The old release files are available though: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz/files/OldFiles/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Should be pretty entertaining.... >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was looking for the date of the first OFBiz's commit. Can't find it >>>> anywhere on sourceforge. has someone still this one ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, as it is the 10th anniversary, should it be possible to make a >>>> special artwork for the logo, or something we could put in the demo ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> TIA, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>>>>>> www.nereide.biz >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
