Yes please, we should avoid adding confusion our release naming convention; next series will be 11.* because it will be branched in 2011 etc...
Jacopo On Jan 28, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > Doing is a lot more work than talking, I don't think it would be a good idea > to change our existing processes based on the hope of change. > > Regards > Scott > > HotWax Media > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > > On 28/01/2011, at 9:17 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > >> I know... >> >> Maybe we shouldn't do a mayor release like 11 when it is based on current >> technology and frame work, but continue on the 10.x branch. >> >> And have the new release, whether that is 11, 15 or NG, based on new >> approaches and insights as stated/discussed in other threads. >> >> Regards, >> >> Pierre. >> >> 2011/1/28 David E Jones <d...@me.com> >> >>> >>> Release "10" was actually the release branch 10.04 because it was branched >>> from the trunk in April 2010. >>> >>> The next release will probably be something like 11.04, because it will >>> proba >> >> >> >> >>> bly be branched in April 2011. However, if it was branched next month the >>> release would be 11.02. >>> >>> If you look at the history you'll notice that there was a release 4.0, but >>> then the next release branch was 09.04. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:58 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: >>> >>>> WootWoot. Hurray for 10 years OFBiz... >>>> >>>> How convenient that release 10 coincides. Maybe we could hold a contest >>> to >>>> get a logo that commemorates the aniversary. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Pierre >>>> >>>> 2011/1/27 David E Jones <d...@me.com> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The project was created on SourceForge.net on 13 May 2001. I don't know >>>>> when the first commit was. >>>>> >>>>> The first preview release (still available on SourceForge) was >>>>> "ofbiz-2001.05.24.zip" which, as the name implies, was released on 24 >>> May >>>>> 2001. Obviously I had been working on the data model and other aspects >>> of >>>>> the project well before the 13 May when the project was officially >>> created >>>>> on SourceForge, and because of that the first main commit had a fair >>> amount >>>>> in it. >>>>> >>>>> The early stuff ran on JBoss and all of the entities were used to >>> generate >>>>> code including container managed EJBs, JSPs for each entity (like the >>>>> current Entity Data Maintenance), etc. It is a testament to the folly of >>> the >>>>> code generation approach for large projects. The generated code was over >>> 1 >>>>> million lines, if I remember right. >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 11:47 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> the earlist copy of ofbiz i have is in 2002 >>>>>> the earliest date I have for cvs is 8/15/2003 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ========================= >>>>>> BJ Freeman >>>>>> Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation < >>>>> http://www.businessesnetwork.com/automation/viewforum.php?f=52> >>>>>> Specialtymarket.com <http://www.specialtymarket.com/> >>>>>> Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist >>>>>> >>>>>> Chat Y! messenger: bjfr33man >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> David E Jones sent the following on 1/27/2011 11:24 AM: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm looking around a little for the old CVS repo on SourceForge (which >>>>> is what OFBiz started with, wasn't much SVN available in those days), >>> and I >>>>> think it may be gone. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The old release files are available though: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz/files/OldFiles/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Should be pretty entertaining.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -David >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:43 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was looking for the date of the first OFBiz's commit. Can't find it >>>>> anywhere on sourceforge. has someone still this one ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Also, as it is the 10th anniversary, should it be possible to make a >>>>> special artwork for the logo, or something we could put in the demo ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TIA, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Erwan de FERRIERES >>>>>>>> www.nereide.biz >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >
