Btw, example scenarios = low-level content CRUD operations.
-Adrian
On 2/4/2011 6:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
As far as I know, the mapping was never discussed - we never got that
far.
From my perspective, the Jackrabbit repository should replace most of
the OFBiz content component. That would be a lot of work though. Your
suggestion might be easier to implement.
It might be helpful to start off with some example scenarios that we
can conceptually map from the current OFBiz implementation to the
Jackrabbit one. A discussion around those example scenarios could lead
to a design document.
-Adrian
On 2/4/2011 12:24 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
Hey,
i played a little bit around with the jackrabbit brunch. Seems that the
basic JCR operations works well OOTB.
But i'm not sure what's the best way to make the connection (mapping) to
Ofbiz.
I would like to create some Interfaces and Adapters for third Party CMS
System that they can easily connect against the JCR Repository. This
could
be implemented on Ofbiz site as well to have our own jackrabbit /
content
maintenance area.
The thing i was little bit confused about is the mapping between the
Ofbiz
Content Table and the repository. We nee a location where we map a
certain
content item with the path in the repository.
I.E. contentId 12001 --> repository Path /node1/foo/baa.
My suggestion is to create a DataResource Entry for this mapping.
Thans we
are apple to create contents and sub contents and later think of
security
concepts for accessing the repository.
Any Ideas, suggestions, opinions :-)
Have a good day
Sascha