+1 Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc
On Feb 21, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > I agree that this would be clearer for users, now that we release more often > > Jacques > > From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to propose a small change to the way we name releases, >> specifically the first release in a branch. >> >> The current naming convention is the following: >> >> a) the name of the release branch is apache-ofbiz-YY.MM where YY.MM is the >> year and month of when the branch was created >> b) all releases coming out from a branch have the major release number equal >> to the branch's YY.MM >> c) the first release in the branch doesn't have a minor release number; the >> name of the first release is then: apache-ofbiz-YY.MM >> d) all subsequent releases (second, third etc...) have a sequential 2-digits >> minor release number (01, 02,...): the second release is >> apache-ofbiz-YY.MM.01, the third release is apache-ofbiz-YY.MM.02 etc... >> >> I would like to change the rules to be: >> >> a) the name of the release branch is apache-ofbiz-YY.MM where YY.MM is the >> year and month of when the branch was created >> b) all releases coming out from a branch have a major release number equal >> to the branch's YY.MM and a minor release number (sequential 2-digits): the >> first release is apache-ofbiz-YY.MM.01, the second release is >> apache-ofbiz-YY.MM.02 etc... >> >> We could start the adoption of the new naming convention with the upcoming >> (April?) first release in the 11.04 branch: instead of "apache-ofbiz-11.04" >> it will be "apache-ofbiz-11.04.01". >> >> What do you think? >> >> Jacopo >>
