On 5/27/2012 5:56 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
On 05/27/2012 07:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
FYI, in the Mini-language overhaul I interned the Element tag name
Strings.
Yes, that's really a good improvment! Things are much more clear now.
It's only in minilang though (I mean not in widgets actions yet), right?
Another thing to discuss is the proper use of Javolution and/or
whether we still need it.
Yes, I also wondered about that last week when willing to cast to a
TreeMap.
The fact that it's a one man project and will maybe less and less
supported http://javolution.org/#HISTORY is not yet an issue but
could be
I personally see no need for javolution. It's non-standard
concurrency(java.util.concurrent). It does it's own memory
allocation, which prevents escape-analysis from working(allocating
memory on the stack instead of the heap).
In the Mini-language overhaul I removed Javolution classes from model
fields - since the models could be kept in memory (cached) indefinitely
(resulting in borrowed objects that are never returned to the pool). I
kept Javolution in the script execution path - which is the proper use
from my perspective. I know you ran into issues with FastMap previously,
but I don't remember the details.
If there are no objections, I can remove Javolution from Mini-language
entirely.
-Adrian
