Thanks Sharad,

The 2nd I already posted earlier, nothing about the subject in these links, 
right? Anyway it's no biggie...

Don't use html format by default for your mails. It increases the SpamAssasin 
score and this could be the reason some of your mails are rejected...

Jacques
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: sharad bhushan 
  To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org 
  Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 5:16 PM
  Subject: Re: FYI: ms & mx vs Xms & Xmx


  Jacques,



  Here are the references

  1. http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/gc-tuning-6-140523.html

  2. 
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/vmoptions-jsp-140102.html

  Resending.. my mail is bouncing not sure why even when i am subscribed..

  Sharad



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
  To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org 
  Sent: Sunday, 24 June 2012 5:54 PM
  Subject: Re: FYI: ms & mx vs Xms & Xmx


  I wonder what is a trusted source information in this context :o)
  It seems that Oracle (and even Sun before) is hidding a lot of information, 
or they don't upate...
  Refer to 
http://stas-blogspot.blogspot.fr/2011/07/most-complete-list-of-xx-options-for.html
  Did not find anything like that for standard option though, and this one is 
hard to read I found.

  Remember me M$ hidding stuff :/

  Jacques

  From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
  > It doesn't seem a very trusted source of information.
  > 
  > Jacopo
  > 
  > On Jun 24, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
  > 
  >> More than once, eg: 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5276197/is-java-heap-space-dictated-by-ram-or-hard-drive
  >> 
  >> Jacques
  >> 
  >> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com>
  >>> On Jun 24, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
  >>>> I read that there is "now" ms & mx standard options
  >>> Hi Jacques, could you please send a reference to the source of this 
information?
  >>> Thanks
  >>> Jacopo
  >>> 
  > 
  >


Reply via email to