Hi Adrian, Then should we not remove it?
Jacques From: <adri...@apache.org> > Author: adrianc > Date: Sun Feb 24 00:29:25 2013 > New Revision: 1449430 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1449430 > Log: > FIXME comment. No functional change. > > Modified: > ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > > Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml?rev=1449430&r1=1449429&r2=1449430&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml (original) > +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml Sun Feb 24 > 00:29:25 2013 > @@ -2506,6 +2506,8 @@ under the License. > <view-link entity-alias="PTY" rel-entity-alias="PTYGRP" > rel-optional="true"> > <key-map field-name="partyId"/> > </view-link> > + <!-- FIXME: This relationship does not make sense. There is no > one-to-one relationship from PARTY to PARTY STATUS, > + so this relation will cause duplicate values for parties with > multiple statuses. --> > <view-link entity-alias="PTY" rel-entity-alias="PS" rel-optional="true"> > <key-map field-name="partyId"/> > </view-link> > >
